3 ms·
> Both archaea and bacteria, in the three-domain model referenced in the article, are prokaryotes. I suppose it depends on which model you use, and as discusse
by mmooss 2y ago
> Both archaea and bacteria, in the three-domain model referenced in the article, are prokaryotes.
I suppose it depends on which model you use, and as discussed they seem to vary and be in flux right now, but the three domain model I learned was prokaryotes, archaea, and eukaryotes - the first two being different domains.
> Yes, "with eukarya containing all multicellular organisms" does not mean "all eukarya are multicellular organisms" it means "multicellular organisms are a subset of eukarya".
We agree. I don't grasp your point?
- xdavidliu 2y ago> We agree. I don't grasp your point? your original comment didn't refute the quote, but one needs to squint hard to see that you didn't refute it.
- mmooss 2y agoI wasn't trying to refute it; I was adding information: The quote didn't mention or imply that there are also single-cell eukaryotes, so I added that detail. Not everything is an argument or attack.
- xdavidliu 2y agoI know that you weren't trying to refute it, and I know that it's not an argument or attack. > with eukarya containing all multicellular organisms Single cell eukaryotes also exist My point is that your statement here looks like a refutation to most, even though I know you did not intend it to be.
- mmooss 2y agoI see. Communication is tricky.