3 ms·
I wonder if the exact phrasing has varied from the source, but even then if "consultation partners" is doing the heavy lifting there. If it was something like "
by prawn 2y ago
I wonder if the exact phrasing has varied from the source, but even then if "consultation partners" is doing the heavy lifting there. If it was something like "useful consultation partners", I can absolutely see value as an extra opinion that is easy to override. "Oh yeah, I hadn't thought about that option - I'll look into it further."
I imagine we're talking about it as an extra resource rather than trusting it as final in a life or death decision.
- worthless-trash 2y agoI'll see if i can dig it up, it was from a real life meeting which I have tossed the printed notes from a while back in disgust.
- worthless-trash 2y ago> I imagine we're talking about it as an extra resource rather than trusting it > as final in a life or death decision. I'd like to think so. Trust is also one of those non-concrete terms that have different meanings to different people. I'd like to think that doctors use their own judgement to include the output from their trained models, I just wonder how long it is till they become the default judgement when humans get lazy.
- prawn 2y agoI think that's a fair assessment on trust as a term, and incorporating via personal judgement. If this was any public story, I'd also factor in breathless reporting about new tech. Black-box decisions I absolutely have a problem with. But an extra resource considered by people with an understanding of risks is fine by me. Like I've said in other comments, I understand what it is and isn't good at, and have a great time using ChatGPT for feedback or planning or extrapolating or brainstorming. I automatically filter out the "Good point! This is a fantastic idea..." response it inevitably starts with...