4 ms·

> Take back what now? Sorry, it was late and you indeed mentioned that it wasn't making it "high level". My bad. Unfortunately, "high level" is quite subjectiv

> Take back what now? Sorry, it was late and you indeed mentioned that it wasn't making it "high level". My bad. Unfortunately, "high level" is quite subjective and I'm not willing to put the time to discuss if something falls under this definition or not. > Why not admit that you can't write the code in question? This act isn't fooling anyone. I asked you to clarify what exactly you want to see (which you didn't quote, even though you quoted basically everything else in my reply). In this particular thread here, there was no mention of age, that was in one of the other threads. So before I write code for something that you don't want to you Again, please explain the requirements for the code again. What exactly do you want to see written in this style?

9rx 2y ago
> In this particular thread here, there was no mention of age Uh... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43487167 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43487167 With respect, are you okay? Between this and your other comment [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43502693 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43502693] that was completely off the rails, I'm worried for you. You seem to have lost your sense of what is going on. If it is simply that you are posting too much and can't keep things straight, making up stories like that you could code something but won't because I wouldn't be able to understand your brilliance to cover your tracks, maybe it's time to stop using the internet for a while?