3 ms·

Yeah, but this is separated issue from the meat processing.

• kome 2y ago
  It's not, it's an ultra-processed food, because you can't just eat mechanically separated chicken, it has to be made into a paste, a goo, to become edible.
  • p1necone 2y ago
    I'm not really sure what you're trying to say here. Paste like texture = ultra processed = bad?
    • Symbiote 2y ago
      To make the paste useful, various artificial additives are used so it sticks together, has a suitable texture and so on.
    • chneu 2y ago
      So, in food production you can't just "make a paste". A lot of chemical stuff begins to happen very quickly. Oxidation being a major one, with separation being another. How do we mitigate these issues? We add things. We'll add emulsifying agents, de-clumping agents, things to retain moisture, other things to retain color(or just treat it with gasses, or dye it), etc etc. While it's easy to say "they're just making a paste", in reality that is not what's actually being done. That said, there are plenty of mechanically processed foods that are fine but fall under the "processed" headline because they're technically processed. The devil is in the details though and people really need to get educated on basic food processing/preparation. I don't mean raw milk or grass-fed carnivore Idiocracy, but even a basic understanding of what a preservative is would be helpful.
      • looofooo0 2y ago
        But is it bad? If you had declare everything in a tomato, you get a long list.