3 ms·

https://teslafsdtracker.com/ https://teslafsdtracker.com/ Community tracking shows 2600+ miles between critical disengagements in California, where the mapping

by 93po 2y ago

https://teslafsdtracker.com/ https://teslafsdtracker.com/ Community tracking shows 2600+ miles between critical disengagements in California, where the mapping is probably the best (if we're going to make a fair comparison to Waymo). Most recent firmware shows 98% of trips have no disengagement at all in California, too. If you made the operating zones extremely tight like Waymo, I'm sure it'd do even better. Your link states this: > In the most ambiguous situations ...[it] requests [to humans] to optimize the driving path. [Humans] can influence the Waymo's path, whether indirectly through indicating lane closures, explicitly requesting the AV use a particular lane, or, in the most complex scenarios, explicitly proposing a path for the vehicle to consider. It's literally a human drawing a line on the map telling the car where to go, in the most manual of ways. It's not an xbox steering wheel and driving remotely, but it's absolutely the same concept with a different interface, including a remote brake button.

ra7 2y ago
> Community tracking shows 2600+ miles between critical disengagements in California, where the mapping is probably the best (if we're going to make a fair comparison to Waymo). This isn't a fair comparison either. FSD is used a lot on highways where crash rates are lower (and hence disengagements will be too). Waymo doesn't go on highways yet and can already go 17k miles without intervention (with a safety driver) in places harder than SF and LA where they're already driverless. > It's not an xbox steering wheel and driving remotely, but it's absolutely the same concept with a different interface, including a remote brake button. How do you know they have a "remote brake button"? Waymo's blog makes no mention of any such thing. They categorically say remote operators have no control over the vehicle. I think you're deliberately trying to mislead with your comments here by slipping in something false with known facts.

by 93po 2y ago

ra7 2y ago

> Community tracking shows 2600+ miles between critical disengagements in California, where the mapping is probably the best (if we're going to make a fair comparison to Waymo). This isn't a fair comparison either. FSD is used a lot on highways where crash rates are lower (and hence disengagements will be too). Waymo doesn't go on highways yet and can already go 17k miles without intervention (with a safety driver) in places harder than SF and LA where they're already driverless. > It's not an xbox steering wheel and driving remotely, but it's absolutely the same concept with a different interface, including a remote brake button. How do you know they have a "remote brake button"? Waymo's blog makes no mention of any such thing. They categorically say remote operators have no control over the vehicle. I think you're deliberately trying to mislead with your comments here by slipping in something false with known facts.