3 ms·
An unhinged man with a gun is significantly riskier than an unhinged man without a gun, so I'm not sure I get your argument. But if you mean it in the philosoph
by soco 2y ago
An unhinged man with a gun is significantly riskier than an unhinged man without a gun, so I'm not sure I get your argument. But if you mean it in the philosophical/categorizational way, I'll just move on because I don't have the knowledge or the interest to label big things while they're flying towards my head - I rather duck first and see afterwards what they were.
- _heimdall 2y agoRight, an unhindged man with a gun is worse than without a gun. A gun that can itself become unhinged is likely worse, or at least more of an unknown. When intelligence comes into the picture the question is what the intelligent thing will do, not how a person will use it. If its just a tool that a person can use it almost certainly isn't itself intelligent at all.