I grant that the term has become commonplace and very catchy and no one has been able to supplant it with a better descriptive I still hold that there is good

I grant that the term has become commonplace and very catchy and no one has been able to supplant it with a better descriptive I still hold that there is good reason to be concerned with researchers claiming to objectively evaluate a silicon based sentience and jumping the gun a bit (imo) by writing articles about LLMs which "dream" and "hallucinate" when the behaviour is a consequence of essentially a non-linear regression model that does not yet show clear signs of the high order emotion/reasoning/awareness/intention Many who research LLMs avoid these terms in their publications for good reason (again imo)