4 ms·
IMHO, what's important for Windows 7 is the established userbase and all the hardware that's already running on Windows 7, not it's UI.
by lynnharry 2y ago
IMHO, what's important for Windows 7 is the established userbase and all the hardware that's already running on Windows 7, not it's UI.
- cosmic_cheese 2y agoMaybe, but there’s no reason why a thoughtfully engineered Win7 clone DE on a lightweight Linux couldn’t run just as well or better on the same hardware.
- aleph_minus_one 2y ago> but there’s no reason why a thoughtfully engineered Win7 clone DE on a lightweight Linux Why not a "thoughtfully engineered Win7 clone Desktop Environment" (without Linux :-) ). By the way: people are working on ReactOS: > https://reactos.org/ https://reactos.org/
- listenallyall 2y agoYour opinion. Win 7 was the best Windows UI, both in looks (Aero) and usability. It was abandoned primarily because Microsoft was trying to achieve some hybrid desktop/tablet/mobile UI that worked poorly for all form factors. Win 11+ (or whatever the next version is called) would be well-suited to return to an Aero-like UI.