4 ms·
Would disagree there — system integration probably accounts for like 90% of development work; just at different layers of abstraction. It’s evergreen work that
by keithwhor 2y ago
Would disagree there — system integration probably accounts for like 90% of development work; just at different layers of abstraction.
It’s evergreen work that companies are endlessly trying to eliminate or automate yet keep running headfirst into.
- soulofmischief 2y agoI would still feel zero job security in such a position, and would be looking for work which is not only intellectually and creatively rewarding, but considerably more difficult to automate. Often this means becoming product-oriented or getting into leadership positions.
- kiratp 2y agoI would urge you to not think this way: https://www.osmos.io/fabric https://www.osmos.io/fabric
- ewoodrich 2y agoYou probably should've disclosed that you are promoting your own company's AI product here...
- TeMPOraL 2y agoDoesn't mean it's not all the same or boring drudge work :). Though I disagree with GP's reply to you about being product-oriented and such - 90% of products are just "system integration" with some custom marketing graphics and a sprinkle of vendor lock in :). Combination of standardization and AI will end in a great carnage of software developer jobs, as system integration is basically the poster child of a job that should not exist in ideal world - i.e. all problems are problems of insufficient automation or insufficient ability to cope with complexity. But there's only so much demand for R&D and creating bona fide new capabilities, and not everyone wants to be a manager or a salesperson... IDK, might be really the time to pick some trade skills, as manual labor in the field is likely the last thing to be automated away.