3 ms·
LangChain is an objectively terrible Frankenstein's monster of an API. If you were a good developer in your youth, you'd have still held it in contempt, and tre
by soulofmischief 2y ago
LangChain is an objectively terrible Frankenstein's monster of an API. If you were a good developer in your youth, you'd have still held it in contempt, and treat MCP with caution.
The MCP API is pretty bad, too, it's just that a paradigm is starting to emege regarding modularity, integration and agentic tooling, and MCP happens to be the only real shot in that direction st this particular moment.
- gnatolf 2y agoCould you elaborate on your issues with LangChain? We're kinda headed towards using it as it seems to be a flexible enough abstraction that is relatively stable to work with, so I'd like to know if I'm overlooking something..?
- gregorymichael 2y agoA lot of folks use it to get started quickly and then realize the unnecessary abstractions are obfuscating the actual hard parts.
- jinushaun 2y agoYou spend more time fighting the tool/framework than working on the product you’re trying to build.
- davedx 2y agoA big soup of untyped json blobs and python, all working highly asynchronously in complicated ways. Is this variable available in my agent’s state? Depends! Is it an agent that started an hour ago before you made that other change? Is it in the manager state or not? Did the previous agent run correctly or not? Did something else go wrong?
- anxman 2y agoCryptic errors that will make you tear your hair out and docs that are constantly changing
- zambachi 2y agoHow is the MCP API bad? It uses simple and widely available standards-based transports while still allowing custom transport implementations, along with a simple API that can be used easily without any libraries, in any programming language under the sun?