> The puzzle could instead have been done in order 2, 3, 1 and 1 would not have needed to go twice. If this is true, then back in the original 1->2->3->1 form,

> The puzzle could instead have been done in order 2, 3, 1 and 1 would not have needed to go twice. If this is true, then back in the original 1->2->3->1 form, shouldn't person #3 have been able to answer it?