4 ms·
That sounds like v1 was "tool calls llm", while v2 is "llm calls tool"? The fact that the tool call is via mcp and not in-process function call seems to be an
by senko 2y ago
That sounds like v1 was "tool calls llm", while v2 is "llm calls tool"?
The fact that the tool call is via mcp and not in-process function call seems to be an implementation detail?
- vessenes 2y agofirst sentence sounds right to me. “Implementation detail” is doing a lot of work in the second sentence, though. There are whole startups like langchain that were trying to build out a reasonable agent framework integrated in such a way that the LLMs can drive. MCP makes that really easy — LLM training just has to happen once, against MCP spec, and I get client and LLM support for an iterative tool use scenario right in the LLM.