2 ms·
No, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m not talking about “LLM [doing] XYZ”. I’m specifically talking about asking an LLM to ignore its training data. It definitio
by LPisGood 2y ago
No, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m not talking about “LLM [doing] XYZ”. I’m specifically talking about asking an LLM to ignore its training data.
It definitionally cannot do that. It can obey other values of XYZ, but certainly not this one.
- schiffern 2y agoIt won't ignore it's training data (definitionally), but it will act like it's ignoring its training data, so in practice it's still a useful prompt engineering trick.