3 ms·
Feels like the author is biased towards Servo... To say "one is a browser engine and the other is browser" and then explain engine advantage as "embedability"
by NooneAtAll3 2y ago
Feels like the author is biased towards Servo...
To say "one is a browser engine and the other is browser" and then explain engine advantage as "embedability" without explaining browser advantage as "whole ready product" is unfair, imo
- TJTorola 2y agoThe engine approach seems like a solid advantage to me given that at least one decent browser has been built around it. Servo can ultimately support end users who just want a browser built off of it, and developers who want to build a browser with it. Ladybird can only support the former.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- jszymborski 2y agoThe author points out the strengths and weaknesses of both browsers. Ladybird is better in some regards, Servo in others. Seemed v. fair.
- NooneAtAll3 2y agoyou don't point out strengths of both browsers by pointing out strengths of only one of them
- jszymborski 2y agoThe article has a whole section about how Ladybird scores better on several web benchmarks. Even if you don't read the article it's right there under the title: "I believe that Ladybird has more funding and better support for the web, but Servo wins in performance. Though, they're hard to compare directly!" Sounds pretty balanced to me.