3 ms·

Right, because Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and X all don't have anyone who knows what they are doing - and also none of them had the bright idea to hire an

• alecco 2y ago
  I think he missed adding: and let them do their job and be smart managing the resources by themselves. Pichai & co put a borderline-communist quota system and it became a popularity contest to get a tiny slice extra of compute. And then OpenAI ate their lunch (Google tech).
  • montag 2y ago
    Do you have a source for this “quota system”
    • alecco 2y ago
      Are you stalking me, doyouhaveasourcebro? Previously https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40273440 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40273440 Self-quoting here: That's in contrast to what OpenAI's David Luan "Why Google couldn’t make GPT-3" (https://www.latent.space/p/adept https://www.latent.space/p/adept): And it turned out the whole time that they just couldn't get critical mass. So during my year where I led the Google LM effort and I was one of the brain leads, you know, it became really clear why. At the time, there was a thing called the Brain Credit Marketplace. Everyone's assigned a credit. So if you have a credit, you get to buy end chips according to supply and demand. So if you want to go do a giant job, you had to convince like 19 or 20 of your colleagues not to do work. And if that's how it works, it's really hard to get that bottom up critical mass to go scale these things. And the team at Google were fighting valiantly, but we were able to beat them simply because we took big swings and we focused.”