2 ms·
Sure Jan, they can just shrug off close to a 100 years of colonization like it never happened. It's not even been 100 years since it officially ended.
by pnutjam 2y ago
Sure Jan, they can just shrug off close to a 100 years of colonization like it never happened. It's not even been 100 years since it officially ended.
- wtcactus 2y agoSo, let me see if I've got this straight: - India had been practicing slavery since immemorial times [1] - Then, the British started ruling the place and after only 2 years in power they abolished slavery in all parts of India they controlled [2] - Then the British left, slavery returned to India, and it's somehow the fault of the British it still exists. This sums up quite nicely your argument, right? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_India#Slavery_in_Ancient_India https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_India#Slavery_in_An... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_India#British_Indian_Empire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_India#British_India...