I guess this is my actual problem with it, or at least the way that it's been received. It implicitly posits that programming is a collection of gadgets. A gadg

I guess this is my actual problem with it, or at least the way that it's been received. It implicitly posits that programming is a collection of gadgets. A gadget is a fine thing, when you have decided _what_ you want to do and are looking for a way to do it. But a gadget-centric process, whether is patterns or microservices, constrains the design space to assemblies. and that a really small and clunky part of the space.