2 ms·
come on dude. "unsecured" as in "not a secure comms system managed and approved by the NSA", which for the US government is normally considered a bad thing. f
by bananapub 2y ago
come on dude.
"unsecured" as in "not a secure comms system managed and approved by the NSA", which for the US government is normally considered a bad thing.
for normal people who don't want the NSA to be managing their comms then Signal is approximately the best possible choice, along with not being a fucking idiot while using it.
- organsnyder 2y agoThe issue isn't the cryptographic strength—the issue is that it doesn't provide capabilities for an organization to manage it (such as preventing unknown parties from being added to group chats).