> They are still not an adequate substitute for Zig's comptime feature. For one and in a sense they are much more limited than comptime functions in Zig The sy

> They are still not an adequate substitute for Zig's comptime feature. For one and in a sense they are much more limited than comptime functions in Zig The syntactic restrictions don't really matter; it's still Turing-complete. The key difference is that types are values in Zig but not in Rust, which is a core design feature of the language and can't be changed easily.