3 ms·
Most interesting thing to me is the spelling is correct. I'm not a heavy user of AI or image generation in general, so is this also part of the new release or
by eitland 2y ago
Most interesting thing to me is the spelling is correct.
I'm not a heavy user of AI or image generation in general, so is this also part of the new release or has this been fixed silently since last I tried?
- widerporst 2y agoIt very much looks like a side effect of this new architecture. In my experience, text looks much better in recent DALL-E images (so what ChatGPT was using before), but it is still noticeably mangled when printing more than a few letters. This model update seems to improve text rendering by a lot, at least as long as the content is clearly specified. However, when giving a prompt that requires the model to come up with the text itself, it still seems to struggle a bit, as can be seen in this hilarious example from the post: https://images.ctfassets.net/kftzwdyauwt9/21nVyfD2KFeriJXUNLbLFN/a54cf3e09e9d3560ec092d4856808769/perodictable.png https://images.ctfassets.net/kftzwdyauwt9/21nVyfD2KFeriJXUNL...
- remuskaos 2y agoThe periodic table is absolutely hilarious, I didn't know LLMs had finally mastered absurdist humor.
- soco 2y agoYeah who wouldn't love a dip in the sulphur pool. But back to the question, why can't such a model recognize letters as such? It cannot be trained to pay special attention to characters? How come it can print an anatomically correct eye but not differentiate between P and Z?
- londons_explore 2y agoI think the model has not decided if it should print a P or a Z, so you end up with something halfway between the two. It's a side effect of the entire model being differentiable - there is always some halfway point.