5 ms·
> I discovered that McDonalds’ terms of sponsoring included that no one else in the areas of the games is allowed to sell french fries, unless they come with fr
by kareemm 14y ago
> I discovered that McDonalds’ terms of sponsoring included that no one else in the areas of the games is allowed to sell french fries, unless they come with fried fish (because the classic dish of Fish & Chips could not be banned in the UK). But besides the Fish & Chips exception, no one is allowed to sell french fries around the games.
My friend dealt with sponsorships in the venues for the Vancouver 2010 Olympics.
One of her tasks was getting the venue menus signed off on by the sponsors.
One of the food vendors wanted to serve potato wedges at the venue.
But because McDonald's was one of the 2010 title sponsors, and they had the same "no french fries" clause, my friend spent ~6 months of her life negotiating with the McD's folks over the difference between potato wedges and french fries.
In the end, the vendor got to serve potato wedges, but McD's got a ton of concessions in exchange (better signage location, etc etc).
- ww520 14y agoWhy do McDonald not want to serve french fries? People love fries. And it's a big profit center for McDonald anyway.
- hartez 14y agoI think they meant that no one except for McDonald's was allowed to serve french fries (or anything similar to a french fry).
- rahoulb 14y agoThat also gets me - anyone who's ever had fish and chips will know that the chips may be fried potatoes but totally unlike McDonald's french fries.