3 ms·

It looks pretty bad https://youtu.be/PTngv5MmtXo?si=cCQcYtRaja5pPP6a https://youtu.be/PTngv5MmtXo?si=cCQcYtRaja5pPP6a

gruez 2y ago
??? https://youtu.be/PTngv5MmtXo?t=105 https://youtu.be/PTngv5MmtXo?t=105 They're admittedly pretty cagey with the parts they're willing to show, but the parts they did show look fine to me. Are you referring to the parts when they showed the 3d mask overlay on top of the characters?
- Symbiote 2y ago
  It's very difficult to judge from these tiny clips. They're supposed to be showing off the technology with this video, but choose many clips with very little dialogue.
- romanhn 2y ago
  I agree with the parent poster. They've chosen the best examples to show off, and yet all of them looked "off" to me. Perhaps because I was paying close attention I was more likely to notice it, but there was definitely an uncanny valley effect to it all.
  - marginalia_nu 2y ago
    To be fair a lot of the same applies to conventionally dubbed films, and then some.
- Rebelgecko 2y ago
  It kinda reminds me of some of the old multiplayer PlayStation games that would flap your characters gums when you used the mic. The motion lines up with the words more or less but it lacks any sort of emotion or emphasis like you'd see with real actors
- bbstats 2y ago
  A few examples are very "gum-flappy"
akgoel 2y ago
Man, this is so much better than many Bollywood movies that are re-dubbed. When the actors go back to the sound studio to re-record their lines, they don't match up with their lips exactly, and it can be off-putting.
ericmcer 2y ago
A 3 minute previewing the technology that shows actual ~4s of "dubbed" footage. Seems legit lol, nothing to brush under the rug definitely.
numpad0 2y ago
Why wasn't the interview done in Swedish and processed with this technology?
- CaptainFever 2y ago
  Because "this technology" only changes the lips visually, and does not do any translation or dubbing. > Notably, the original actors recorded their own dialogues in English in a sound booth — Flawless AI's technology merely altered the movements of their lips in the movie.

??? https://youtu.be/PTngv5MmtXo?t=105 https://youtu.be/PTngv5MmtXo?t=105 They're admittedly pretty cagey with the parts they're willing to show, but the parts they did show look fine to me. Are you referring to the parts when they showed the 3d mask overlay on top of the characters?

Symbiote 2y ago
It's very difficult to judge from these tiny clips. They're supposed to be showing off the technology with this video, but choose many clips with very little dialogue.
romanhn 2y ago
I agree with the parent poster. They've chosen the best examples to show off, and yet all of them looked "off" to me. Perhaps because I was paying close attention I was more likely to notice it, but there was definitely an uncanny valley effect to it all.
- marginalia_nu 2y ago
  To be fair a lot of the same applies to conventionally dubbed films, and then some.
Rebelgecko 2y ago
It kinda reminds me of some of the old multiplayer PlayStation games that would flap your characters gums when you used the mic. The motion lines up with the words more or less but it lacks any sort of emotion or emphasis like you'd see with real actors
bbstats 2y ago
A few examples are very "gum-flappy"

akgoel 2y ago

Man, this is so much better than many Bollywood movies that are re-dubbed. When the actors go back to the sound studio to re-record their lines, they don't match up with their lips exactly, and it can be off-putting.

ericmcer 2y ago

A 3 minute previewing the technology that shows actual ~4s of "dubbed" footage. Seems legit lol, nothing to brush under the rug definitely.

numpad0 2y ago

Why wasn't the interview done in Swedish and processed with this technology?

CaptainFever 2y ago
Because "this technology" only changes the lips visually, and does not do any translation or dubbing. > Notably, the original actors recorded their own dialogues in English in a sound booth — Flawless AI's technology merely altered the movements of their lips in the movie.