3 ms·
Google has this habit of 'releasing' without releasing AI models. This looks to be the same? I don't see it on the API price list: https://ai.google.dev/gemin
by throwaway13337 2y ago
Google has this habit of 'releasing' without releasing AI models. This looks to be the same?
I don't see it on the API price list:
https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing
I can imagine that it's not so interesting to most of us until we can try it with cursor.
I look forward to doing so when it's out. That Aider bench mixed with the speed and a long context window that their other models are known for could be a great mix. But we'll have to wait and see.
More generally, it woud be nice for these kinds of releases to also add speed and context window as a separate benchmark. Or somehow include it in the score. A model that is 90% as good as the best but 10x faster is quite a bit more useful.
These might be hard to mix to an overall score but they're critical for understanding usefulness.
- minimaxir 2y agoIt's available now as an option in Google AI Studio and Google Gemini.
- ototot 2y agoand the price is 0.0 usd, lol
- wenyong3124 2y ago[dead]
- throwaway13337 2y agoThanks. I think my post lacked clarity of what I was talking about. I meant that most people care about API access to use with their favorite editor. It's a big limiter with grok, for example. But I did mingle that with my knowledge of google's history of releasing without releasing these models which, as you point out, isn't true with this release.
- kmod 2y agoIt's "experimental", which means that it is not fully released. In particular, the "experimental" tag means that it is subject to a different privacy policy and that they reserve the right to train on your prompts. 2.0 Pro is also still "experimental" so I agree with GP that it's pretty odd that they are "releasing" the next version despite never having gotten to fully releasing the previous version.