3 ms·
Agreed, can't everyone just use semantic versioning, with 0.1 increments for regular updates?
by falcor84 2y ago
Agreed, can't everyone just use semantic versioning, with 0.1 increments for regular updates?
- laurentlb 2y agoRegarding semantic versioning: what would constitute a breaking change? I think it makes sense to increase the major / minor numbers based on the importance of the release, but this is not semver.
- falcor84 2y agoAs I see it, if it uses a similar training approach and is expected to be better in every regard, then it's a minor release. Whereas when they have a new approach and where there might be some tradeoffs (e.g. longer runtime), it should be a major change. Or if it is very significantly different, then it should be considered an entirely differently named model.
- morkalork 2y agoOr drop the pretext of version numbers entirely since they're meaningless here and go back to classics like Gemini Experience, Gemini: Millennium Edition or Gemini New Technology
- joaogui1 2y agoWould be confusing for non-tech people once you did x.9 -> x.10
- guelo 2y agoWhat would a major version bump look like for an llm?
- eru 2y agoGoing from English to Chinese, I guess? Because that would not be a compatible version for most previous users.