> The second part is much more ambiguous, and unfortunately, the bill lacks specificity. OpenAI wants to ban the use of DeepSeek models: "As with Huawei, there

> The second part is much more ambiguous, and unfortunately, the bill lacks specificity. OpenAI wants to ban the use of DeepSeek models: "As with Huawei, there is significant risk in building on top of DeepSeek models in critical‬‭ infrastructure and other high-risk use cases given the potential that DeepSeek could be‬‭ compelled by the CCP to manipulate its models to cause harm." from: https://cdn.openai.com/global-affairs/ostp-rfi/ec680b75-d539-4653-b297-8bcf6e5f7686/openai-response-ostp-nsf-rfi-notice-request-for-information-on-the-development-of-an-artificial-intelligence-ai-action-plan.pdf https://cdn.openai.com/global-affairs/ostp-rfi/ec680b75-d539... > I’d be surprised if it made it very far, and even more surprised if any of the hyperscalers supported it OpenAI is calling for legislation: https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/13/openai-calls-deepseek-state-controlled-calls-for-bans-on-prc-produced-models/ https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/13/openai-calls-deepseek-stat... > no one in the Western world is going to run a Chinese-hosted model anyway AWS offers DeepSeek already: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/deepseek-r1-model-now-available-in-amazon-bedrock-marketplace-and-amazon-sagemaker-jumpstart/ https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/deepseek-r1-mo...