3 ms·
I’d argue this whole discussion is a flaw of the English language. Quoting Pratchett “English doesn’t borrow from other languages. English follows other languag
by AnotherGoodName 2y ago
I’d argue this whole discussion is a flaw of the English language. Quoting Pratchett “English doesn’t borrow from other languages. English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.”
English has a lot of words from different origins that are more or less synonyms and one of the most common time wasting behaviours i’ve seen is people endlessly trying to categorize those words in endless debate.
The web is full of endless slideshows with titles such as ‘the difference between management and leadership’ or some such. One’s a latin word and the others german for basically the same concept and since english has both (it steals from every other language without care) you’ll find a million slideshows people have created on the differences between the words. This whole thread is yet another example of this behaviour and if you’re aware of it you’ll very quickly tire of every fucking ‘the difference between [english loanword from latin] and [english loanword from german]’ thread you’ll see.
- pixl97 2y ago“The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.” ― James D. Nicoll
- School-Cotton 2y agoYou’re right overall, but I hate that quote. English doesn’t have a lot of duplicate words because of some aggressive vocabulary-stealing nature. It has a lot of duplicate words for the same reason modern Nahuatl has a lot of loanwords from Spanish: England was colonized and ruled for centuries by non-English-speaking people.