> Your proof of concept requires a human-level intelligence being in control of the car. How is that cheaper than LiDAR? This is the core of the problem. Lidar

> Your proof of concept requires a human-level intelligence being in control of the car. How is that cheaper than LiDAR? This is the core of the problem. Lidar doesn't actually change any of that, it still needs AI that's just as strong, if not stronger. All it gets you is a more reliable point-cloud (in some situations, maybe less reliable in others), that you'll then have to interpret. There's no getting around the need of having a powerful AI behind it all.