4 ms·
> The data/time overhead would be negligible. Doubling or tripling the amount of data sent would be negligible over a wire, but an audio protocol won't be as s
by gryfft 2y ago
> The data/time overhead would be negligible.
Doubling or tripling the amount of data sent would be negligible over a wire, but an audio protocol won't be as snappy. Then there's the matter of trust/decryption. How are those keys being kept safe? What happens if I lose access?
- Retr0id 2y agoThen don't double or triple the amount of data sent. There's simply no need.
- stavros 2y agoYou can encrypt data and keep the exact same original byte size.
- gryfft 2y agoIf you're using symmetric encryption, sure. And then every dishwasher has the same symmetric key, guaranteeing it'll leak.
- stavros 2y agoEverything uses symmetric encryption, including asymmetric encryption. Using symmetric encryption doesn't mean you'd use the same key for every dishwasher, you'd obviously just pair the devices and generate a new key, like everything does nowadays. Also, my dishwasher doesn't use any sort of encryption, and it still leaks.