> Occured to me that sometimes, simple enough is not good enough for us programmers There's a beautiful article recently linked about naming conventions, there

> Occured to me that sometimes, simple enough is not good enough for us programmers There's a beautiful article recently linked about naming conventions, there's also another about "The worst developer". Incredible reads. Simple is good, but it depends on context, it's an absolute certainty we like reducing problems to solvable gradients. This is a good thing. We all love problems, solving them is 1 challenge, solving them beautifully is another #2 thing.. Never making those problems is an architect thing. We all grow to evolve but learn from eachother.