There are several comments here using the same logic, which I find to be rather...odd: >It's a blog post not a news article or scholarly report. - The topic is

There are several comments here using the same logic, which I find to be rather...odd: >It's a blog post not a news article or scholarly report. - The topic is a business run by people who ostensibly make decisions based on their faith to justify actions which cause various harm to others. Taking a critical view of those actions and the motivations is reasonable. and the author shares the same view.... I am being asked to take a critical look at Hobby Lobby, the reasons are outlined in the linked Substack. However, if I have any questions or criticisms of the Substack article, please note that it is not a professional work it is just a guy with a microphone. If I can't trust the source material, how can I trust the claims?