3 ms·
> Have been told that I have to “drop the sarcastic tone” if I want to be “taken seriously” as a “““reporter””” but the jokes on them because that criticism imp
by jt2190 2y ago
> Have been told that I have to “drop the sarcastic tone” if I want to be “taken seriously” as a “““reporter””” but the jokes on them because that criticism implies that I’ve crossed the threshold into being a “journalist” rather than a “guy with a substack”
https://substack.com/@meghanboilard/note/c-102976235 https://substack.com/@meghanboilard/note/c-102976235?
- themaninthedark 2y agoThere are several comments here using the same logic, which I find to be rather...odd: >It's a blog post not a news article or scholarly report. - The topic is a business run by people who ostensibly make decisions based on their faith to justify actions which cause various harm to others. Taking a critical view of those actions and the motivations is reasonable. and the author shares the same view.... I am being asked to take a critical look at Hobby Lobby, the reasons are outlined in the linked Substack. However, if I have any questions or criticisms of the Substack article, please note that it is not a professional work it is just a guy with a microphone. If I can't trust the source material, how can I trust the claims?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]