1. I don't see why you need to solve Trusting Trust to make libc and the shell more robust. 2. If we are worried about Trusting Trust, then Rust is worse; at l

1. I don't see why you need to solve Trusting Trust to make libc and the shell more robust. 2. If we are worried about Trusting Trust, then Rust is worse; at least C has the wide range of compilers needed for diverse double-compiling and as of https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2023/the-full-source-bootstrap-building-from-source-all-the-way-down/ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2023/the-full-source-bootstrap-... we arguably have a working solution. Rust only has a single compiler, and that compiler is used to build itself, making it the poster child for Trusting Trust targets.