> Even in the best case scenario for LLMs, they aren't mind readers. They'll be time savers. In otherwords, they are cheaper mid to entry level employees which

> Even in the best case scenario for LLMs, they aren't mind readers. They'll be time savers. In otherwords, they are cheaper mid to entry level employees which don’t get sick or have emotions. I think most people would agree with this. One of the reasons well informed curious people tend to underestimate the value of LLMs despite their flaws is they underestimate the amount of routine work that could be automated but is still done imperfectly by humans. LLMs lower the barrier to entry to halfway decent automation and eliminating those jobs. Where I’m not sold yet is on the whole idea of bots that go off and do their own thing totally unsupervised (but increasingly, you are having models supervise one another).