4 ms·

You are correct, of course, but the general consensus is that (in languages other than C++) compilers are largely close enough to deterministic that the differe

by Yoric 2y ago

You are correct, of course, but the general consensus is that (in languages other than C++) compilers are largely close enough to deterministic that the difference doesn't matter. LLMs, by design, don't even attempt to go in this direction. Not entirely sure what I'd do with an LLM -S switch. Debug the output/intermediate representation of the LLM, knowing that the next time I press "enter", it's probably going to give me an entirely different output?

pjmlp 2y ago
It won't be much different from human computers in that regard, isn't after all what everyone is looking for as replacement?
- Yoric 2y ago
  Probably, yes. But then, aren't we all happy that we moved from human computers and to electronic computers with programming languages and compilers?