3 ms·
Sure, it's convenient to have PATH, but why not have an optional way to say "hey, ssh, run /usr/bin/rsync on the remote with the following arguments, directly a
by yjftsjthsd-h 2y ago
Sure, it's convenient to have PATH, but why not have an optional way to say "hey, ssh, run /usr/bin/rsync on the remote with the following arguments, directly and without a shell please"? Equivalent to a Dockerfile containing
cmd foo
vs
cmd ["/bin/foo"]
(IIRC, at least - been a minute since I needed to do this.)
- pabs3 2y agoSee the OpenSSH bug above.