4 ms·
> would be akin to how most humans see a ball in flight and just instinctively know (within reason) where the ball is going to go? Generally no. If I show you
by klabb3 2y ago
> would be akin to how most humans see a ball in flight and just instinctively know (within reason) where the ball is going to go?
Generally no. If I show you a puddle of water, can you tell me what shape was the ice sculpture that it was melted from?
One is Newtonian motion and the other is a complex chaotic system with sparse measurements of ground truth. You can minimize error propagation but it’s a diminishing returns problem, (except in rare cases like for natural disasters where a 6h warning can make a difference).
- mnky9800n 2y agoWhile generally correct there has been evidence that machine learning models can predict multiple Lyapunov times past traditional models. [1] https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.024102 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.024102 [2] https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043252 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043252