3 ms·
https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1969.tb02887.x https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2164-... Here’s a fascin
by dr_dshiv 2y ago
https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1969.tb02887.x https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2164-...
Here’s a fascinating 1969 article about the same bacterium called “From Superstition to Science.” — The whole thing is worth a read, but I especially loved how it traces the blood effect back to Pythagoreanism. Pythagoras the Biologist!
It quotes a 170 AD satire by Lucian, “the sale of creeds” about the god Hermes auctioning off different philosophies.
“Pythagoreanism:
Of living animals I eat none. All else I can eat, except beans.
First Buyer:
And why no beans? Do you dislike them?
Pythagoreanism:
No. But they are sacred things. Their nature is a mystery. Consider them first in their generative aspect; take a green one and peel it, and you will see what I mean. Again boil one and expose it to moonlight for a proper number of nights, and you have—blood. What is more, the Athenians use beans to vote with.”
- gsf_emergency_2 2y agoMaybe Pythagoras just wanted to rationalize curing his G6PD deficiency (aka favism) with negative homeopathy