>There is no reason not to think that there won't be different machine learning methods to supplant the current ones, Sorry, is that a triple negative? I'm con

>There is no reason not to think that there won't be different machine learning methods to supplant the current ones, Sorry, is that a triple negative? I'm confused, but I think you're saying there WILL be improved algorithms in the future? That seems to jive better with the rest of your comment, but I just wanted to make sure I understood you correctly! So.. Did I?