3 ms·
I think you're trying to impart a political motive where it can be argued that none existed. I understand that your mind is made up, however consider that the w
by arunabha 2y ago
I think you're trying to impart a political motive where it can be argued that none existed. I understand that your mind is made up, however consider that the whole initial effort by DOGE was clearly poorly planned and resulted in a lot of chaos.
For a journalistic perspective, when events are moving fast, you report what is known at a given time.
Hindsight is always 20/20 and no doubt there are some cases like you point out. However, are you sure that those are the only cases? The fact that the govt is scrambling to hire back fired people would suggest otherwise.
The desire to impute political bias to everything is not a useful way of viewing the world.
- ForOldHack 2y agoIt is a realistic and accurate way to see the politicization of climate science. Bush, and the head of NASA Goddard is the documented and publicized example sans vacuum of disinformation.