3 ms·
(I did read the whole article from top to bottom.) When space exploration and colonization of planets and moons will costs trillions of dollars over decades (t
by ChrisNorstrom 14y ago
(I did read the whole article from top to bottom.)
When space exploration and colonization of planets and moons will costs trillions of dollars over decades (the international space station alone costs $150 billion, costs $650 million every shuttle launch) how can a country invest so much into something that will be fruitless for the nation?
Now I'm with him in terms of desire. I don't "like" any ONE country to own mars or the moon in the same I way a lot of early Americans, African Nations, Indians, etc... didn't "like" being owned by the British Empire. But we have to be realistic, when the people of a colony (on the moon or mars) use taxpayer funded space ships, equipment, support, fuel to reach and colonize that planet or moon and depend on their home country for constant sustenance. Claiming independence is ridiculous and just not going to happen. I wouldn't blame them for desiring independence, but that's just not possible given the expensive nature of interplanetary exploration. The only way to have an independent Mars is to hope for privatized space exploration. Not like NASA + SpaceX but a completely private space program. From funding to execution, from creation to exploration to maintenance.
- kstenerud 14y agoI'm sure the early explorers' bankrollers and later colonizing powers thought along similar lines. And yet the Americas are neither French nor English or Spanish nor Portuguese properties.
- ChrisNorstrom 14y agoThe America's didn't require water and food to be constantly shipped from France, England, or Spain on government funds. This isn't another continent, this is another planet. The rules are different.