4 ms·
> I kind of agree with him. Definitely not in six months :) I certainly hope not. But three to six years from now? I’m not so confident.
by Xenoamorphous 2y ago
> I kind of agree with him. Definitely not in six months :)
I certainly hope not. But three to six years from now? I’m not so confident.
- techpineapple 2y agoMaybe, but I don’t think we’ve definitively answered the question - are LLMs smart. If LLMs get to the point that they can unpack almost any logic that one might need for a function or class that’s amazing, but if it doesn’t understand the why, I think that leads to fundamental limitations in progress. And maybe I’m still not using the right tools, but I’m not finding cursor/claude 3.7 to be close.
- namaria 2y agoI think LLMs are intelligence augmenting. They are a tremendously powerful search tool but you need to know what you are looking for. The idea that they can replace workers is laughable. I am afraid though that the current state of LLMs is too expensive for its use case. So I'm trying not to lean too much on them.