4 ms·
how do you know that the offices haven't been used in years and there is no impact unless a journalist told you? Is there any reason to trust rando twitter acco
by guelo 2y ago
how do you know that the offices haven't been used in years and there is no impact unless a journalist told you? Is there any reason to trust rando twitter accounts besides the fact that it makes you feel better about "your side".
- dingnuts 2y agohe probably just believes a source that didn't turn out to be directly funded by the US government, one you would likely dismiss as not a real journalist I'm all for free media but the legacy outlets currently screaming about cuts are primarily upset because THEY just lost a ton of government funding but that's good because I don't want government run news, even if it comes in a bunch of brand names, and it's funny that all the "reputable" outlets just happen to be the ones with the closest relationships to the CIA and FBI and historically have covered for their worst injustices. no, I do not shed a tear for what is happening to the old government controlled legacy media.
- DrillShopper 2y ago> he probably just believes a source that didn't turn out to be directly funded by the US government One probably sponsored by the Russian government: https://apnews.com/article/russian-interference-presidential-election-influencers-trump-999435273dd39edf7468c6aa34fad5dd https://apnews.com/article/russian-interference-presidential...
- MikePlacid 2y agoThese days if something isn’t labeled as Russian propaganda it’s probably not true.
- ForOldHack 2y agoSimple. There is photographic evidence, and eyewitness accounts, by a celebrated journalist ego happens to be a friend of mine.