3 ms·
No. We don’t need to make conversations so boring as to allow you and your robotic ink to completely unambiguously understand them. For every one person that di
by bolognafairy 2y ago
No. We don’t need to make conversations so boring as to allow you and your robotic ink to completely unambiguously understand them. For every one person that didn’t get this obvious Bluey reference deep in a Bluey thread, I’m sure that 100 more DID get it.
- eru 2y agoSure, you can optimise for your cool in-jokes, and exclude people. What's robotic ink?
- defrost 2y agoProbably robotic ilk using the more common modern usage of ilk - https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/ilk https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/ilk .. along with an unintended cool in-joke about how dogs can't type.
- eru 2y agoYeah, at first I thought it was 'ilk', but then I suspected that there was yet another exclusionary in-joke hidden somewhere.