3 ms·
I think your example highlights why most people don't view these as plausible concerns: 1. If I had a family member who was a serial murderer or rapist a la th
by hn_throwaway_99 2y ago
I think your example highlights why most people don't view these as plausible concerns:
1. If I had a family member who was a serial murderer or rapist a la the Golden State Killer, I would want him apprehended.
2. "the criminal might well learn/suspect that they have been compromised through you?" That doesn't seem reasonably plausible enough to me to care. What, cousin Billy Bob is going to come hold me hostage because he knows I used 23 and me at some point? Really??
- kortilla 2y ago> 1. If I had a family member who was a serial murderer or rapist a la the Golden State Killer, I would want him apprehended. But you are apprehended instead and are responsible for now coming up with an alibi.
- krisoft 2y agoThat is not how dna evidence works in my understanding. They would know if you are a partial match or a complete match.