4 ms·
Open mind here. Spill more details please. We're the 9 good or was their dead weight. Could the 9 to 2 have been done without AI anyway (because less work to do
by nextts 2y ago
Open mind here. Spill more details please. We're the 9 good or was their dead weight. Could the 9 to 2 have been done without AI anyway (because less work to do).
- bobxmax 2y agoThey were good... probably a bit bloated. Without AI we could probably be 5 devs. With AI we can do it all in 1-2.
- nextts 2y agoTrying to get my head around this. It must mean 90% of what they were doing was writing code. Like not even thinking, architecture, gathering requirements, make sure you built the right thing etc. Just generating syntax.
- bobxmax 2y agoIn my experience it's usually a few devs doing the most of that, and the rest are largely banging out features, debugging, refactoring. There's also just a lot more efficiency when you shrink the team.
- nikolas- 2y ago> They were good So why wouldn't you keep them? If you're able to produce even more with AI enabled engineers, why downsize? To me, it sounds like a startup's dream to be able to output more without increasing headcount.
- c0redump 2y agoThe person you’re talking to is simply lying. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43449975 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43449975