4 ms·
> For now, they are worth evaluating and discussing, but are not ready for us to delegate the precise task of creating reliable, secure, and scalable software t
by clvx 2y ago
> For now, they are worth evaluating and discussing, but are not ready for us to delegate the precise task of creating reliable, secure, and scalable software that powers our society.
The good thing about vive coding is it avoids the software development lifecycle completely from the user perspective in a platform that has an integrated SDLC which means from defining idea to ensure visibility in changes to a runtime where the user can see it. In my mind, modifying without a hassle in a controlled environment is what users look for. Software development assisted by AI will be a thing for engineers but Vive coding is aimed for users outside of engineering.
I sadly see only a handful of companies being able to pull this off.
- BowBun 2y agoThe thing is the SDLC exists to harden software to a point where you can run a business on it. It didn't appear because people were bored. This feels more like a comparison to a Figma or other prototyping tool than something that can produce quality software.