2 ms·
This is exactly correct technically and perfectly on the existing “paved path” of technology determinism. My company is actively in the process of demonstratin
by AndrewKemendo 2y ago
This is exactly correct technically and perfectly on the existing “paved path” of technology determinism.
My company is actively in the process of demonstrating the “Learning machine” which is a Weiner style cybernetic system of systems
It’s unquestionable at this point that machines will displace all human labor where labor efficiency is the key factor for investment/use. Start with transfer learning from existing human machine interfaces and then expand to onpolicy with human feedback to SARSA.
The only remaining question is the persistent one “who benefits”
Almost nobody is working on what to do after
- zurfer 2y agoI think plenty of people are working on that, some unaware :P Games for status will continue. Consuming experiences will continue (experiences that require humans will be premium). And in a good case, we will still have plenty of work to do to decide what to do (going to space, making earth sustainable, merging with machines, ...).
- gom_jabbar 2y ago> Almost nobody is working on what to do after One interesting possibility is that this is not something humans need to work on at all - because, as Nick Land famously put it, "Tomorrow can take care of itself." [0] [0] https://retrochronic.com/#meltdown https://retrochronic.com/#meltdown
- BriggyDwiggs42 2y agoWhy’s he write like if I tried to mimick anti-oedipus