3 ms·
Given you called the senate 'gerrymandering' I think you had an idea before you hid behind this socratic method to avoid making any assertion yourself.
by ty6853 2y ago
Given you called the senate 'gerrymandering' I think you had an idea before you hid behind this socratic method to avoid making any assertion yourself.
- mmooss 2y agoToo bad you have to turn a conversation into a fight. I wasn't thinking that at all. I hope your day improves!
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- ty6853 2y ago... you were trumping up how rural people had an oversized hand. Now you pretend you have no idea. Lets not play dumb.
- mmooss 2y agoWhen you stop seeing everything through an adverserial filter, you'll find a world of friendly, interested, curious people. I know from experience. Just put faith in people, learn to recognize your subjective biases (usually driven by emotion) - even if you can't see past them, just know they're there and have some blind faith - and you'll be amazed. I know from experience. Here's a trick: Go through this process: 'My emotions, which are not reality; are ...; my perceptions, which are not reality, are ...; if I bring my intellect to bear, I've learned ...'. At no point do we know reality - those things are all we've got, 'shadows on the wall'. The process forces us to sync up our frontal cortex and the emotional parts of our brains, which is essential and powerful, and to get some distance from our own perceptions.
- ty6853 2y agoWhy are you so emotionally hostile to the fact that the founders would have found the present day government wildly unconstitutional? The Constitution has been amended and reinterpreted many times since then, why on earth would that be done if the things they wanted were already constitutional at time of founding?