6 ms·
For what it's worth, I don't think there's any hard evidence that big companies are doing this. Aside from the technical difficulties of constantly listening to
by abound 2y ago
For what it's worth, I don't think there's any hard evidence that big companies are doing this. Aside from the technical difficulties of constantly listening to 1+ B mobile devices and running speech-to-text, it'd also be a legal quagmire.
What's more likely happening is far more boring: humans as a whole are very predictable, and the metadata that Facebook et al have access to is more than enough to identify these patterns.
To _really_ try and test this, you could download the Facebook (or Amazon or whatever) app, and (within earshot of your phone) consistently talk about some completely random purchaseable item that you have no intent to purchase and have never otherwise indicated you have an interest in. Chances are you will not get ads for it.
To make it less likely you pick something that is subconsciously on your mind (and thus able to be picked up via your metadata), try playing word association games to pick the product in question. E.g. banana > yellow > raincoat > weather > digital thermometer
- toast0 2y ago> To _really_ try and test this, you could download the Facebook (or Amazon or whatever) app, and (within earshot of your phone) consistently talk about some completely random purchaseable item that you have no intent to purchase and have never otherwise indicated you have an interest in. Chances are you will not get ads for it. That's the trick isn't it. How do you choose a random purchasable item without indicating interest in. Is it because it was something you saw recently, but don't want to buy? How many (targetting) similar people near you also saw that and may want to buy? How much is that ad being shown to you now, but you hadn't noticed because you weren't interested in the product? It's certainly possible to carefully craft an experiment, but it's not easy. And a poorly crafted expirement won't show much.