3 ms·
You're kind of inferring the inverse argument to what I pointed out. I believe in healthy discussion and along with the original creator of Rust I agree that th
by Voultapher 2y ago
You're kind of inferring the inverse argument to what I pointed out. I believe in healthy discussion and along with the original creator of Rust I agree that there are plenty of things Rust didn't solve [1]. Nor do I believe that Rust is the perfect tool for all tasks. It's a good tool for a significant chunk of problems. That's where I stand.
That said, equating people arguing in bad faith to any form of disagreement. Sorry here we disagree.
[1] https://graydon2.dreamwidth.org/253769.html https://graydon2.dreamwidth.org/253769.html
- datadeft 2y ago> plenty of things Rust didn't solve I agree on that too. > Nor do I believe that Rust is the perfect tool for all tasks. No disagrement here either. I was just not really getting why you are attacking OP with assuming bad faith content from him immediatelly. Maybe I misread your comment.